Hydrogen in the Baltics: Projects, Numbers and Why the Market Is Not Taking Off
(Material 1 in the “Hydrogen vs Biomethane” series)
The EU’s official target remains ambitious: tens of millions of tonnes of renewable hydrogen by 2030 and a continental hydrogen backbone connecting industrial clusters. But by the end of 2025, Europe’s own regulators describe the market as far behind schedule: production is expensive, electrolysers are deployed far more slowly than planned, and energy companies hesitate to commit without clear rules.
The Baltic region reflects this European reality in a very precise way. It has projects, pilot infrastructure and political declarations — but not a viable hydrogen market. Looking at concrete cases shows why.
1. EU reality: targets vs deployment
Across Europe, hydrogen faces three systemic constraints:
Cost — Green hydrogen remains several times more expensive than fossil alternatives once electricity, balancing and capital costs are included.
Electrolyser scale — Installed capacity by the end of 2024 reached only a fraction of the planned gigawatt-level deployment.
Regulatory uncertainty — Companies face overlapping definitions of “renewable” and “low-carbon” hydrogen, sustainability rules and inconsistent national support schemes.
The gap between political ambition and technological readiness drives a broad market slowdown.
2. Baltic projects: real, but limited in purpose
Klaipėda hydrogen hub
Klaipėda is currently the most advanced hydrogen project in the region. The port is building a production and refuelling facility intended for:
port machinery and trucks,
visiting vessels,
and, from 2026, public hydrogen refuelling.
This is strategically valuable, but its scale is modest. The project is designed to support port operations and early adopters — not to supply industry or export hydrogen.
BalticSeaH2 and the Finnish–Estonian “valley”
The cross-border hydrogen valley centred on Finland and Estonia aims to test production, mobility and industrial use in a coordinated way. It is a research and demonstration platform, not a commercial system. Its purpose is to generate knowledge, validate technologies and map market models, not to deliver large volumes of hydrogen.
3. Fokker Next Gen Latvia: a hydrogen aviation case that never industrialised
The hydrogen aircraft concept promoted in Latvia in 2023–2024 illustrates how far expectations can run ahead of industrial reality.
Latvia expected a production line in Liepāja, cooperation with universities and dozens of engineering jobs.
In practice, the Latvian company behind the project was a small legal entity with minimal capital, no team and no physical activity.
By late 2025, it entered liquidation, and all aviation development work consolidated in the Netherlands.
This case is not a scandal. It shows how hydrogen aviation remains a long-cycle R&D field and why complex aerospace projects naturally gravitate toward ecosystems that already have certification capacity, suppliers and qualified labour.
4. Local hydrogen valleys: infrastructure without a market
Several Baltic cities announced “hydrogen valleys” to support public transport or mobility pilots. The reality is simpler:
hydrogen for buses is almost always produced from natural gas,
retail prices often exceed ten euros per kilogram,
utilisation rates are low,
lifecycle emissions are not better than diesel,
and operating costs remain significantly higher than electric alternatives.
These projects deliver experience and data, but they do not create a sustainable hydrogen economy.
5. Structural constraint: the Baltic electricity balance
Hydrogen is, above all, an electricity product.
Large-scale green hydrogen requires:
A stable surplus of renewable electricity,
Low prices for long operating hours,
Balancing flexibility in the grid.
Baltic electricity systems still face the opposite profile:
Latvia covers only part of its consumption from domestic generation and remains a net importer in most quarters.
Lithuania and Estonia also carry structural deficits on an
Image: photos/photo_103@10-12-2025_18-58-59.jpg