Social Radar | XBaltic
🇱🇹🇱🇻🇪🇪🏦 Government & Central Bank use of X (Jan 1–25, 2026)
This snapshot tracks how Baltic governments (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia) and their central banks use X as a communications channel. The sample covers official accounts of Presidents, Prime Ministers, Foreign/Defense Ministers, MFAs, and government handles.
Engagement = likes + reposts + quotes + replies + bookmarks (summed across posts). Followers are aggregated across the analysed accounts. For comparability, we use engagement per post and engagement per 1,000 followers (normalised). All figures are from public X data (no private analytics).
1) The scoreboard
Lithuania (scale leader): ~46 posts → 30,303 engagements | ~503,481 followers
≈ 659 engagements/post | ≈ 60 per 1k followers
Estonia (efficiency leader): ~32 posts → 26,314 engagements | ~145,666 followers
≈ 822 engagements/post | ≈ 181 per 1k followers
Latvia (volume leader, weakest conversion): ~48 posts → 3,144 engagements | ~98,633 followers
≈ 66 engagements/post | ≈ 32 per 1k followers
What this means in plain numbers:
Lithuania generated ~9.6× Latvia’s engagement with roughly similar post volume. Estonia generated ~8.4× Latvia’s engagement with fewer posts.
If Latvia looks like a mid-sized organisation on X, the maths supports the impression.
2) What drives engagement: themes and framing
Across all three, the highest-performing topics are predictable: Ukraine support, NATO/security, and historical memory. The difference is not “what”, but how it is framed and who amplifies it.
🇱🇹Lithuania: humanitarian + history (high resonance)
Strongest pull comes from internationally shareable posts: Ukraine aid, commemorations, solidarity framing.
The ecosystem benefits from high-reach anchors (President + MFA + MoD), which keeps engagement compounding.
Theme split (approx.): Ukraine ~45%, security ~25%, history ~15%.
🇪🇪Estonia: fewer posts, sharper global hooks (best conversion)
Estonia posts less, but consistently targets global security narratives and alliance signalling.
Higher normalised performance suggests a stronger “distribution network”: posts travel beyond the domestic circle.
Theme split (approx.): Ukraine ~35%, Arctic/transatlantic ~30%, international politics ~20%.
🇱🇻Latvia: steady output, domestic-weighted agenda (lowest conversion)
Latvia posts most, but content is more domestic/technical/regional, which tends to be less viral internationally.
Even when posts get external attention (including media references), the engagement uplift appears limited — a sign of shallow conversion from visibility to interaction.
Theme split (approx.): Ukraine ~35%, defense/NATO ~25%, history ~15%, economy ~15%.
3) Central banks: the quietest channel in the room
🏦Central banks are almost absent on X during the period:
Lithuania CB: 0 posts | 0 engagement | 2,287 followers
Estonia CB: 0 posts | 0 engagement | 2,405 followers
Latvia CB: 11 posts | 47 engagements | 11,757 followers (financial tips + economic notes; low interaction)
This is a missed opportunity: central banks can be high-trust communicators, yet they are largely not using X as an outreach tool.
4) Bottom line
🇱🇹Lithuania wins on scale (big combined audience + consistently shareable topics).
🇪🇪Estonia wins on efficiency (highest engagement per post and per follower).
🇱🇻Latvia wins on cadence — but loses on conversion: ~66 engagements/post and ~32 per 1k followers is a different league from Estonia’s ~822/post and ~181 per 1k.
Central banks remain underutilised across the region.
Source note: public X data (compiled via Grok/xAI).
BSM © 2026 | balticfocus.org/
Image: photos/photo_174@26-01-2026_13-21-59.jpg